On Protest Movements & Conspiracy Theories, in 2-part Harmony. Common Time. Part II

What a field-day for the heat
A thousand people in the street
Singing songs and carrying signs
Mostly say, hooray for our side…
            (Allegro)

Our original reflection was concerning how a Paranoid Author would conspire, were he so inclined, to develop and implement a plan to subvert a nation like America. Richard Rubenstein suggested a model for such a conspiracy in The Cunning of History, and defends his philosophical mooring, and by extension my futuristic fantasy, with the following points.

1)   Scientific Theory. In the scientific way of speaking about nature there is the principle that biological life is imperialistic, which is to say that living things, in their populations, will naturally expand into available space in order to dominate that space and to ensure their own survival.

2)   Rubenstein’s Conclusion (100). If this is an accurate description of nature, then it is useless to speak of the ethical life of the individual, because "In all biological populations there are innate devices to adjust population growth to the carrying capacity of the environment. Undoubtedly, some such device exists in man."

Rubenstein (8-11) also enumerates and then illustrates what he thinks are at least two of those plausibly “innate devices” or “control mechanisms” that, even perhaps without our “conscious knowledge,” regulate human population and ensure its suitable expansion.

1)   War as a mechanism of population control. At the Battle of Verdun (begins February 1916) the German general’s strategy, says Rubenstein, was entirely biological in nature. “For the first time in memory a European nation had attempted to alter the biological rather than the military and political balance of power with an adversary." In this 9-month long battle, approximately one million men died. At the Battle of the Somme (begins July 1916), the British lost approximately 60,000 men the first day.  By December 1916 approximately 1,100,000 British, German, and French were dead in order for the British lines to move forward just 6 miles.

            On Rubenstein’s calculation, in WW I there were on average 6,000 state-made dead per day for 1,500 days, which means that each and every one of the countries involved in this conflict (i.e., Albania, Arabia, Austria-Hungary, Belgium and colonies, Brazil, Bulgaria, China, Costa Rica, Cuba, Czechoslovakia, Estonia, Finland, France and Empire, Great Britain and Empire, Germany and Empire, Greece, Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras, Italy and colonies, Japan, Latvia, Liberia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Montenegro, Nicaragua, Panama, Persia, Philippines, Poland, Portugal and colonies, Romania, Russia, San Marino, Serbia, Siam, Turkey, Transcaucasia, and the Unites States of America) were in tacit agreement that some 10 million state-made dead represented a satisfactory, acceptable, and indeed desirable, political, economic, and moral loss.

2)   Bureaucracy as a mechanism of population control. It also seems pretty self-evident that in order for States to function as the gatekeepers for the regulation of human population and expansion, there needs to be some sort of fundamental organization or bureaucracy. One of the tools for this in the Nazi period was denationalization, the use of the status of statelessness for certain selected populations inside the greater population. Rubenstein (33): “Men without political rights are superfluous men. They have lost all right to life and human dignity. Political rights are neither God-given, autonomous nor self-validating. The Germans understood that no person has any rights unless they are guaranteed by an organized community with the power to defend such rights. They were perfectly consistent in demanding that the deportees be made stateless before being transported to the camps. They also understood that by exterminating stateless men and women, they violated no law because such people were covered by no law.”

What we need to retain for our Fantastic Reflection, then, is that there are two natural “control mechanisms” that regulate human population and ensure its suitable expansion:  War and Bureaucracy.

Paranoia strikes deep
Into your life it will creep
It starts when you're always afraid…

            (Obbligato - Allegro)

So, as the paranoid oracle-author of a potential American future, what philosophical ingredients would I need to assemble in order to transmogrify the E Pluribus Unum into the Nazi State of Rubenstein’s vision? Straight-forward wars and official state-made dead are integral to our plottings, of course, but there are also other, less noticeable steps that can be taken to dehumanize or destroy humanity beyond the destruction of individual bodies. The State can dehumanize or disappear the philosophical idea of the Individual.

            Now a promising recipe, which the Paranoid Author could follow in order to prepare the ground for the philosophical death of the Individual, would be the following: I) find ways to neutralize the idea of the cogito-Individual, as did the philosopher Martin Heidegger for his Nazi State; II) create an economic setting in which there was a strong and independent economic culture that The People believed in or valued or needed, and that The People could not control or dominate; and III) design a type of general cultural or State environment,

·      where All and Sundry were somehow being controlled,

·      where there is an appearance of Freedom reigning,

·      but where no one actually has the practical freedom or leisure to act against the agendas represented or furthered by Moneyed Interests.

Plot-lines in the Fantasy.

I. Neutralize the idea of the cogito-Individual. In order to make a philosophical reconstruction of America along the lines of Rubenstein’s vision, the Paranoid Author would need to start a process of dismantling the philosophical idea of the cogito-Individual. One part of this neutralization or dismantlement is the creation of a pervasive atmosphere of Fear, because it is necessary to convert the listener into an Emotional Person, a strongly feeling (believing) person who will naturally follow, rather than the calm path of rational consideration and analysis, the impulsive inclination of irrational emotions. In such a widespread environment of fear, the People would learn to respond with fear in the following general areas:

a)    Fear relevant to Religion – Fear of displeasing God, end of the world, destruction of the planet, fear of hell, damnation, eternal punishment, loss of heavenly crowns, etc.

b)   Fear relevant to Economics – Fear of job loss & unemployment, banking issues, crashes, downturns, big business, financial mismanagement, Ponzi schemes, mortgage defaults, debt ceilings, bankruptcies and liquidations, financial instability, debt in general, money shortage, rising cost of education, economic ratings, etc.

c)    Fear relevant to Politics – Fear of immigration, health care reform, civil liberties, political difference, defense spending, socialism, Social Security, Welfare, Medicare, wars and more wars, Iran and the bomb, Arab Spring, Islamic fundamentalism, War on Terror, War on Drugs, War on Poverty, War on Christmas, War on Women, etc.

d)   and Fear relevant to Social Issues – Fear of abortion (because it displeases God, see above), gay and lesbian rights (because it displeases God, see above), diversity, sexual predation, smoking pot, race issues, global warming, pornography, contraception, the environment, stem cell research, et al – see also Politics, Economics, and Displeasing God.

Ia. Neutralize the idea of the cogito-Individual. (Ostinato). Additionally, the Paranoid Author could create a society that neither values nor rewards learning, that systematically vilifies teachers, that places the bar low enough for pupils and students so that measurable standards of learning progressively decline over the long-term. It is a reasonable prediction, all factors considered, that low and under-achieving youth will develop into low and under-achieving adults, thereby reducing the competition pool for labor at the upper levels; so the State that deliberately adopts a social principle of undereducating its young people will have an undereducated, and more easily swayable, adult population in the following generation. Cheap labor will attend on every corner; fears and emotions and conspiracy theories will abound.

Ib. Neutralize the idea of the cogito-Individual. (Ostinato). Finally, to neutralize the idea of the cogito-Individual in America, the Paranoid Author would polarize the population at large on general issues. Individuals would be encouraged to identify emotionally with a major political party, or group, or platform; the increase in group identification would psychologically diffuse the “individual-ness” of the individual, would encourage the growth of Unreasoning Emotionalism in the general society, and would contribute to the overall culture of generalized Fear. To polarize people in this way would also serve to breed into We the People a fundamental social dysfunction based on an emotional dissonance –

ü  together with our own feelings of patriotism or love of country, we also believe that most other Americans are profoundly confused or misguided or simply wrong in their feelings of patriotism;

ü  although we all learned in school that we are individual elements of We the People, we still have the strong feeling, indeed the conviction, that we are nationally yoked together with people who are not our religious, economic, political, intellectual, and/or social equals.

Within a very few generations of orchestrating into existence a generalized culture of Fear, the Paranoid Author of America’s Potential Future would have generated a population that identified itself through collectivizing values, such as patriotism, which are grounded in the individual emotionally rather than intellectually; this would effectively allow a partial transfer of practical democratic power to emotionally inspired groups instead of to thinking individuals.

                                                             

II. People, Belief, and Economic Culture. In order to construct an America that would look like the German State of the Nazi era, the Paranoid Author would also need to grow a strong and independent Economic Culture that The People valued, then believed in, and then needed for their economic survival, but which The People could not control or dominate. Such a value could be created along the lines of a Corporate Culture, which would encourage the existence and growth of a massive conglomeration of companies driven by profit, whose profits could be guaranteed that much more because these companies would be exempted from a tax commitment to the U.S. due to their international legal status. An additional “touch” would be to make it so that this C-Culture has legal standing, so that it can influence in turn the direction of political elections in the U.S., and especially those at the highest levels. This would naturally encourage the C-Culture to make financial contributions to politicians who favor the economic agenda and philosophical vision of the C-Culture, thus furthering the acceptance of that economic cultural agenda as an “American” value.

            A possible example of the type of Corporate Culture that our Paranoid Author might create, would be reflected in the American political setting that enabled the United States Supreme Court 2010 ruling on Citizens United v. FEC.

III. The Appearance of Freedom. For the purposes of plot, however, it would not be sufficient simply to create a dependent relationship between The People and an Economic Culture whose mission is assessed in terms of Compulsory Profit. The Paranoid Author would also have to create a general cultural environment where, as we said above, everyone thinks they are free, but where no one actually has the freedom to act in opposition to the agendas of the Moneyed Interests.

            So once we had generated an adequate Corporate Culture, and had brought The People around to valuing, believing in, and then needing that C-Culture, the active icing on the passive (cup-)cake would be to restrict and obstruct the power of the individual worker-laborer to stand against that C-Culture. So the Paranoid Author would then invent a labor pool that is powerless to oppose the interests of the massive corporate entities, either to control wages, or to determine working conditions, health benefits, retirement, etc. In a hauntingly parallel, union-breaking plot line from American current events, Wisconsin and its governor Scott Walker, have furnished interesting and relevant food for my fantasy-laden thought over the past year:

Ø  Wisconsin Governor Threatens To Replace Union Workers With National Guard

Ø  Wisconsin Union Law To Take Effect

Ø  Scott Walker's Collective Bargaining Law Keeping Wisconsin Unions From Seeking Recertification

Ø  Wisconsin Collective Bargaining Law Struck Down By County Judge

Ø  Wisconsin Union Law Challenge Heads To Federal Appeals Court

Ø  On Governor Walker in general and teachers in particular

IIIa. The Appearance of Freedom. (Ostinato). I can also imagine that if, for purposes of plot development, a Paranoid Author needed to restrict the power of both the State and the individual to stand against the Corporate Culture, he might introduce into his narrative the device of giving almost unlimited credit to almost everyone. The idea of debt, both individual and national, is a great and very effective means of enslavement, because Individual Debt actually functions just like State Debt in compelling the debtor to yield up Power (i.e., transfer Loyalties) to the creditor. The idea of Individual Debt allows the individual to hamstring himself all by himself – to buy houses, cars, appliances, furniture, televisions, stereo systems, clothes, jet skis, jet ski trailers, vacations, food, gas, etc.; and the evil bit of beauty in this narrative device is that even when the consumerable object itself is long gone on its journey to built-in obsolescence, the financial debt for the purchase of the object remains. Business wins; or as Hercule Poirot might have said: Cherchez l’argent.

            Likewise, the idea of State Debt allows The State to hamstring itself through collective liability – to pay for wars, infrastructures, schools, hospitals, social services, etc. It was due to support from Business, after all, that Napoleon Bonaparte succeeded in his coup d’état following the French Revolution. His financial indebtedness to those same Business Interests (primarily a coalition of slavers and exiled plantation owners) who funded his rise to power, also obligated Napoleon to reciprocate the favors, £ for £, by introducing legislation that would reverse the course of revolutionary France, and cause its return to an extremely aggressive and repressive form of Business Slavery in the French colonies – all in the interests of the Sugar Trade. Cherchez l’argent.

           

IIIb. The Appearance of Freedom. (Ostinato). Even more icing on the proverbial cupcake of debt could be provided by health care—not the having of it, but the individual and societal indebtedness caused by the lack of it. Medical expenses were the top cause of bankruptcies in America in 2011 – a total of 1.6 million people, a stunning number that surpasses the population of 82 of the world’s 230 countries.

Stop, now, what's that sound
Everybody look what's going down
Stop, children, what's that sound
Everybody look what's going down…

            (Resolution - Repeat and fade)

So is there something happening here, or am I just paranoid? How realistic is such a Fantasy Future for America? Well, it certainly would not be the first time America had been caught out on such a turning in the road; fortunately, though, Germany lost that war for all of us, which corrected that particular potential wrong-turn in America’s history.

            Nations-going-wrong is not new in this telling. But what do we do as individuals when we suspect that our Nation is going down a Wrong Path in the Woods, and there is no handy GPS to right Us? Well, the Americans have a long tradition of protesting, in a bluesy kind of way, by singing their anger and grief. This is a kind of populist public airing of dirty laundry, which is certainly idiosyncratic, and also, at least anecdotally, effective. According to the Internet God: “In the 20th century, the Union Movement, the Great Depression, the Civil Rights Movement, and the War in Vietnam all inspired protest songs.” Concerns for the environment in America are already evident from an 1837 song, Woodman, Spare That Tree, although, fortunately, the song never caught on.

            From 1900 to 1920 there were Protest Songs inspired by the Labor Movement, and what Americans would tend to call Class Struggle (which in the U.S. took the form of conflict between labor and management, rich and poor), and also The Great War. Popular songs from this period were, The Preacher and the Slave and Bread and Roses.

            The 1920s and 1930s echoed with songs of protest against The Great Depression (see Class Struggle above) and Racial Discrimination, which will have a good long run in America. A popular song from this period is Ragged Hungry Blues.

            In the 40s and 50s there will be protest songs in favor of the labor movement and against McCarthyism, as there will be Anti-Nuclear protest songs. From this generation comes the Pete Seeger tune, Which side are you on?

            In the 60s, of course, there were protests for every taste and every budget. One could sing and protest about the Civil Rights Movement, the Vietnam War, and Peace and Revolution. These songs and protests would wend their way into the 70s, as did the war, and would join their dithyrambic countrified beats to the newer cadences of soul music.

            The 80s would hear Anti-Reagan protest songs, and would oversee the birth of rap music; and the 90s would hear the advent of Hard-Rock Protest Bands, songs of Women's Rights, and Protest Parodies.

So I suppose that a traditional response to the America of my paranoid fantasy would be, when and if, for The People to sing out its disapproval very publically.

            There are also very concrete steps The People can take, though, when it seems to them that the Nation is going down a wrong national road. In the case of the Supreme Court decision on Citizens United, for example, what happens when The People do not support a Supreme Court ruling? Is there any recourse for The People, or is the National Monolith gone awry? Yes, there is recourse and remedy. State initiatives, motivated by Concerned Citizens, could push Congress to create a constitutional amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which would allow the legislature to overturn decisions arising from a judicial branch of government gone on philosophical walkabout.

Let The People write songs in protest and sing them; sign petitions; be concerned; have a big loud voice and make it heard; READ. In the end, though, it would seem that all these Big Thoughts take us right back ‘round to the cogito-Individual, to a Socrates, who, in the name of Justice, stood his ground in the face of undeniable State corruption… till death did them part.